Subscribe to our Newsletter
Receive our weekly newsletter, updates, and promotions, to your inbox.
If you are a non-autistic partner in a mixed-neurotype relationship, you may find communication differences challenging, which can sometimes lead to mutual misunderstandings, feelings of frustration, or misplaced blame. This can increase the risk of relationship distress. Recent research by Jones et al. 2024 investigating the “double empathy problem” shows that both sides can struggle to read and be read. Here, we discuss the findings and their meaning for mixed-neurotype relationships.
One hundred and two non-autistic observers rated the smoothness and enjoyment of non-autistic and autistic pairs interacting. Results showed:
Interaction Pairing | Observer rating (smoothness & enjoyment) |
non-autistic ↔ non-autistic | highest |
autistic ↔ autistic | similar to non-autistic |
autistic ↔ non-autistic | noticeably lower |
Observers rated mixed conversations as the least smooth and enjoyable, yet they didn’t observe any drop in quality when two autistic people chatted. These findings were interpreted by the researchers to mean that autistic–non-autistic interactions tend to be judged against non-autistic norms, rather than mutual strengths.
These mismatches reflect a bias in non-autistic people toward familiar non-autistic social signals (fluid eye contact, fast turn-taking, layered small talk) when observing autistic people interacting. The biases led the non-autistic observers to see the autistic individual as having less social status. As couples therapists, we see these unconscious biases play out in relationships, which can lead to both partners feeling less worthy, undervalued, and frustrated, and unhappy in their relationship. Biases toward one’s natural social communication style are natural and understandable. However, these biases can sometimes be a hidden problem for the couple, undermining relationship satisfaction.
Although the findings of this study were based on brief interactions between strangers, there were no significant differences in intimacy, satisfaction, or willingness to interact again between conversational partners, whether their partner was autistic or non-autistic. Thus, the foundations for connection are there; the main challenges were in surface-level misperceptions, for example, about smoothness or level of disclosure. A deeper understanding of differing communication styles by each partner and a conscious effort to use strategies to bridge the gap are likely to lead to a deeper connection and relationship satisfaction. Below, we suggest five ways to bridge the double empathy divide.
The Jones et al study shows that mixed-neurotype interactions are not inherently inferior but are at risk for being measured by a one-size-fits-all standard. As partners with a shared goal of a happy relationship, you can rewrite the rules:
By sharing space where both of you adapt and learn, it is possible to overcome the double empathy divide and build a relationship where neurodiversity becomes a source of strength, not a stumbling block.
Jones, D.R., King, K., Botha, M., Ackerman R. A., & Sasson, N.J. (2024) Non-autistic observers both detect and demonstrate the double empathy problem when evaluating interactions between autistic and non-autistic adults, Autism, Vol. 28(8), 2053 –2065